Strategy-proof preference aggregation: Possibilities and characterizations
نویسندگان
چکیده
An aggregation rule maps each profile of individual strict preference orderings over a set of alternatives into a social ordering over that set. We call such a rule strategyproof if misreporting one’s preference never produces a different social ordering that is between the original ordering and one’s own preference. After describing two examples of manipulable rules, we study in some detail three classes of strategy-proof rules: (i) rules based on a monotonic alteration of the majority relation generated by the preference profile; (ii) rules improving upon a fixed status-quo; and (iii) rules generalizing the Condorcet-Kemeny aggregation method. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Number: D71. ∗ This research project was begun during Sprumont’s visit at the Indian Statistical Institute in New Delhi in 2010–2011. He is most grateful to the members of the ISI for their hospitality and thanks Arunava Sen for stimulating conversations. We thank the Fonds de Recherche sur la Société et la Culture of Québec and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for financial support. The comments of an associate editor and two referees are gratefully acknowledged.
منابع مشابه
Strategy-proof Judgment Aggregation
Which rules for aggregating judgments on logically connected propositions are manipulable and which not? In this paper, we introduce a preference-free concept of non-manipulability and contrast it with a preference-theoretic concept of strategy-proofness. We characterize all non-manipulable and all strategy-proof judgment aggregation rules and prove an impossibility theorem similar to the Gibba...
متن کاملComparison of Conflict Management Strategies of Physical Education Office Managers Based on some Demographic Characteristics
The purpose of study was comparison of conflict management strategies of physical education office managers based on their some demographic characteristics. All of managers of physical education office of Mazandaran (n = 15) and Guilan (n = 16) province and their assistant [(n = 15) and (n =16) respectively] response to Putnam and Wilson’s “organizational communication conflict instrument (OCCI...
متن کاملModels of Manipulation on Aggregation of Binary Evaluations
We study a general aggregation problem in which a society has to determine its position on each of several issues, based on the positions of the members of the society on those issues. There is a prescribed set of feasible evaluations, i.e., permissible combinations of positions on the issues. Among other things, this framework admits the modeling of preference aggregation, judgment aggregation...
متن کاملSolidarity in preference aggregation: Improving on a status quo
Working in the Arrovian framework, we search for preference aggregation rules with desirable solidarity properties. In a fixed-population setting, we formulate two versions of the solidarity axiom welfare dominance under preference replacement. Although the stronger proves incompatible with efficiency, the combination of efficiency and our second version leads to an important class of rules whi...
متن کاملCharacterizations of scoring methodsfor preference aggregation
The paper surveys more than forty characterizations of scoring methods for preference aggregation and contains one new result. A general scoring operator is self-consistent if alternative i is assigned a greater score than j whenever i gets no worse (better) results of comparisons and its ‘opponents’ are assigned respectively greater (no smaller) scores than those of j. We prove that self-consi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 85 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014